This opinion paper reflects on the current challenges facing urban drainage systems (UDS) research, along with solutions for fostering sustainable development. Over the course of a year-long project involving 92 participants aged 24–38, including PhD candidates, post-doctoral researchers, and early-career academics, we identified critical challenges and opportunities for the sustainable development of UDS. Our exploration highlights four key challenges: limited public visibility leading to resource constraints, insufficient collaboration across subfields, issues with data scarcity and data sharing, and geographical specificities. We emphasise the importance of raising public and political awareness regarding UDS's vital role in climate adaptation and urban resilience, advocating for blue-green infrastructure and open data practices. Additionally, we address systemic academic barriers that hinder innovative research. We call for a shift away from metrics that prioritise quantity over quality. We recommend establishing stable career pathways that empower early-career researchers. This paper aims to catalyse a broader community dialogue about the future of UDS research, uniting voices from various career stages. By presenting actionable recommendations, we aim to inspire fundamental changes in research conduct, evaluation, and sustainability, ensuring the field of UDS is prepared to meet pressing urban water management challenges worldwide.

The PROMISCES project aims to develop innovative, systemic solutions to protect health, environment, and natural resources from persistent, mobile and potentially toxic (PM(T)) substances by addressing regulatory gaps and promoting circular economy principles. This deliverable, in particular seeks to:

· Identify inconsistencies, gaps, and challenges within the existing EU legal and policy framework related to PM(T) substances.

· Promote harmonized regulatory approaches across environmental compartments.

· Provide EU and national policymakers with actionable, evidence-based policy recommendations to improve the management of PMT(s) in the soil-sediment-water system (and beyond).

· Emphasize that updated policy approaches address disparities and technical, financial and social challenges across Member States (MS).

The "Toolbox Fate & Transport Modelling of PMTs in the Environment" is a key deliverable from the H2020 PROMISCES project. This toolbox is a demonstrator that includes a collection of models developed in the PROMISCES project which are designed to assess the fate and transport of persistent, mobile, and toxic substances (PMTs) across various scales (local, regional) and conditions (e.g., urban run-off, bank filtration, unsaturated zone, groundwater).
This toolbox presents the basic information with links to the software and model input files with which the models can be run. This deliverable is intended for qualified modellers. It is complementary with the Guidance document, deliverable D2.4 (Zessner et al., 2025) which describes how to apply modelling tools in a tiered way as part of predictive risk assessment.

The scope of this document, produced as part of the H2020 PROMISCES project, is to provide guidance for applications of models with a specific focus on model trains for the assessment of exposure to PMTs as part of the predictive risk assessment related to surface and groundwater. This document explains the basic concepts of specific models and how best to use them in model
trains in the framework of a tiered approach. The intention is to inform users and interested stakeholders about what needs to be considered when using different methods, what is the best use of specific models, what are the best combinations in model trains and what are their current limitations.

The Horizon 2020 project PROMISCES aims to increase the circularity of resources by overcoming barriers associated with the presence of PM(T)s in the soil-sediment-water system.

This deliverable provides guidance on how to co-create a solution strategy for dealing with PM(T)(s) in a circular economy. For this, we have used the experience and lessons learnt in the co-creation workshops organized within the PROMISCES project.

Emission model to calculate the monthly load of pollutants entering various water bodies and watercourses via stormwater and wastewater via the separate sewer system, combined sewer overflows (CSOs) and wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluent.

In 2020, the European Union published ordinance EU 2020/741, establishing minimum requirements for water reuse in agriculture. The ordinance differentiates between several water quality classes. For the highest water quality class (Class A), the ordinance mandates analytical validation of the treatment performance of new water reuse treatment plants (WRTP) related to the removal of microbial indicators for viral, bacterial, and parasitic pathogens. While the ordinance clearly defines the numeric target values for the required log10-reduction values (LRV), it provides limited to no guidance on the necessary sample sizes and statistical evaluation approaches. The main requirement is that at least 90 % of the validation samples should meet the requirements. However, the interpretation of this 90 % validation target can significantly impact the required sample size, efforts necessary, and the risk of misclassifying WRTPs in practice. The present study compares different statistical evaluation approaches that might be considered applicable for LRV validation monitoring. Special emphasis is placed on the use of tolerance intervals, which combine percentile estimations with sample size-based uncertainty and confidence regions. Tolerance interval-based approaches are compared with alternative methods, including a) a binomial evaluation and b) the calculation of empirical percentiles. The latter are already used in existing European and U.S. regulations for bathing water and irrigation water quality. Our study demonstrates that using tolerance intervals allows for the reliable validation of WRTPs that achieve high LRVs relative to regulatory targets with comparatively smaller sample sizes compared to the other two approaches, while reducing the risk of misclassification. Additionally, we show that simplified approaches, such as a “9 out of 10” approach, pose a substantial risk of misclassification and should not be applied. We illustrate the behavior of these different approaches through simulation experiments and application to real data collected in 2022 and 2023 at a large WRTP in Germany.